Reasons to question recent events

After watching a program relating to 9/11, I wanted to post some reasons, or lack of why we are in a state of confusion here in the U.S. I was never really one to buy into all of the conspiracy theories a while ago, always kind of thought those types were the ones who did not come from the same thread as me. Never thought that they were really people who were upright citizens of society. The thing is, I found that most of the "thoeries" come from within our very own structured government. Many of those who speak out, are demoted from their seats in congress, some are charged with crimes and unfortunatley some are shot and killed for speaking out. Most notibly, John Fitzgerald Kennedy and his brother, Robert. If you feel JFK had no insight as to what his colleagues were up to, google his last speech, the day before he was in Dallas. Have a listen and make your own choice.

The issue with this continues with the tragedy we witnessed on September,11 2001. It may be hard for most of us to accept that the very people we put in office(or who we voted for at least), would have the notion of possible harming us and every other country in the world. Since 9/11, many events and issues have all seemed to follow suit. If one is to look on the websites of the people who were labled as conspiracy theorists, you will see a lot of questions that most of us asked ourself, but would not ever think could be carried out in such a way to allow most of us to think twice.

I have now drawn my own conclusions that there has been too much information withheld, too many stories that did not seem correct and way too many families affected by this. The obvious ones that stand out in my mind are how were cell phone calls connected from such altitudes that the 4 planes attained before going to their targets. Studies have shown that in a private single engine Cessna at altitudes of no more than 2500 ft above sea level, had no cellular service. If you saw an airliner that was at maximum 2500 ft that was not within a 2 mile radius of a major airport, you would be alarmed, not to mention fact that the sheer science shows that the airliners are pressurized much more insulated than that of a single engine aircraft. We all have been in buldings today, when service by cell phone providers is at a peak, had our signal go out. SO that raised a flag in my mind. But that is just one example.

Another one that was brought up to me by a friend of mine was the fact that outside the Pentagon, there was only one camera that picked up footage of the flight that struck the outer wall.. If you walk through ANY major city now you will notice cameras at almost every corner, so the fact that there was not another camera that saw an airliner, in our Nation's capital, that struck the headquarters of military operations, not pick up such an event is absurd. I will not even mention the fact that Andrews was less than 11 miles away. Also the fact that the side that was struck, was the renovated side and virtually empty and top brass was not located on that side as well. As far as the hijacker that took over the flight, Hani Hanjour, it was reported by his flight instructors in Maryland, that he was having trouble controlling his two-seat Cessna trainer. He would fail his test for his private license. He must have played a lot of Microsoft Flight-Sim to have controlled a commercial jet.

Aside from the above conflicting facts, it just kept piling up for me. The main thing that most people who have the feeling we were lied to about 9/11 speak about is WTC number 7. This building was at the World Trade Center, but not directly near the twin towers. The interesting thing about this building is it has many problems with the official event we saw that day. Here are the main reasons I see problems with what we were told.
1. Why was remnants of Thermite, an explosive used in large demolitions, found in the dust and debris of all 3 buildings that crashed?
2.What was the reason it was reported by all major networks WTC 7 collapsed 20 minutes before it actually fell?
3. How was the building(WTC 7) affected by WTC 1 and 2 collapse, but other structures closer to the twin towers, had no damage?
4.Why did building 7 seem to collapse just like a controlled demolition?
5.If there was explosions placed in the building, how is it possible to plant such things when the main tenants were the CIA and FBI?

There are more reasons why we should all stop and think the story we were told has some problems with it. I find it weird that the 9/11 commission reports that none of the flight data recorders were found. Of all the incidents that occur with the FAA, there has never been another example of black boxes being not recovered. Small fragments of bone of the victims that were on the WTC site and on the flights that hit the towers were recovered from all of the mass of metal and debris, yet somehow the finest and most detailed detectives could not find large orange boxes that are made of steel.

Many of the victims family members have tried to speak out against what we were told. Many officials that worked at the site and at WTC have said what happened and have been followed,had their residences bugged with survaillance items, and been threatened for their life. Many of these people are not the people that resemble the "Deadheads" that pass out flyers on the corners of city streets. These people are professionals, Pilots, Firefighters, Medical Examiners and Maintenence workers for WTC.

Most of us who go against the grain are going to be viewed as if we are Communists or something similar as Fox news would have it. So there is too much resistance to get anything done that represents what is moral these days. Mainly for fear of being labled something they are not. The bottom line is that there are facts that have been withheld and science and professional citizens prove it.

Some helpful links to determine your stance.

www.911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.st911.org
www.9-11commission.gov